Science Speaks and Relies on Open Discussion
Since there has been little debate in the major media to discuss diverse points of view on the science concerned with how to manage the pandemic…It’s time we create places for discussion. Science speaks! Please feel free to add your perspective below.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has been widely discounted and subject to censorship even though he stands behind the notion that science speaks. His book, The Real Anthony Fauci, is meticulously referenced to highlight the science behind almost every statement in all 480 pages. The book has received rave reviews from scientists, but, still, he has not been invited to debate with Dr. Fauci. You can find some perspectives by watching the newly launched film or reading endorsements of the book:
“Dr. Joseph Goebbels wrote that ‘A lie told once remains a lie, but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.’ Tragically for humanity, there are many, many untruths emanating from Fauci and his minions. RFK Jr exposes the decades of lies.”
—Luc Montagnier, Nobel laureate, a joint recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
…“The depth of information and facts, all carefully cited, is mind-blowing. It is a must-read. I think it will really help clarify what has been going down here…The world is now able to clearly see that the US-HHS [Health and Human Services] has been captured and compromised by commercial interests. One unintended consequence of allowing and enabling this tragedy will be further erosion in domestic trust in the Public Health System, and in particular, in the entire vaccine enterprise.” —Robert W. Malone, MD, virologist, immunologist, molecular biologist; involved with studies which led to the earliest steps towards mRNA vaccine development.
“At the beginning of the COVID pandemic, a leader rose to the stage, and his soft voice and welcoming smile drew us in, and we trusted him emphatically. After reading Bobby Kennedy’s earth-shattering book, The Real Anthony Fauci, it is clear that our trusted COVID leader shouldn’t be on a pedestal and should instead be on trial. This book is a must-read for anyone wondering why the United States of America refused to mandate wellness and instead pushed a problematic vaccine.”—Rachael Ross, MD, PhD
Science Speaks: Remedies No Longer Under Patent
One of the most hair-raising parts of the discussion is the now proven and well-published fact that effective remedies approved long ago, and no longer under patent, can successfully stop the progression of the disease, Covid-19. When a drug is no longer under patent then it can be freely replicated at competitive prices. Big pharmaceutical companies have nothing to gain. The question then arises: Was information suppressed about effective alternatives to the vaccines? Might there be effective alternatives that don’t reach the major media to inform the public? David McCullough, MD, MPH,(a cardiologist, internist and epidemiologist) and other MDs have generously shared what they have found to be highly effective.
In August 2020, McCullough’s landmark paper “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection” was published online in the American Journal of Medicine. The follow-up paper is titled “Multifaceted Highly Targeted Sequential Multidrug Treatment of Early Ambulatory High-Risk SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19)” and was published in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine in December 2020. It became the basis for the home treatment guide. Unfortunately, this information was not circulated to the public.
An Invitation to YOU
Please use the comment boxes below to express your response to the film and/or the book. Thank you.
Author: Emma Bragdon, PhD. Executive Director of Integrative Mental Health University.
You can check out our 40+ courses HERE.
How do I read comments other people have written. Maybe no one has commented yet. I have heard the hype about ivermectin, but I don’t understand the mechanism by which an anti parasitic medication can treat a viral infection.
Oh Dear Emma, thank you SO much for putting this out to your mailing list and inviting conversation. Due to my iatrogenic injury from psych drugs, I’ve been following this closely from the outset. I have been shocked to see most progressives completely ignoring what RFK, Jr. brought forward in this book. (I bought the book and read much of it when it was first released.) I followed Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Robert Malone from early 2021 and have watched the split narrative, lack of debate, mandates and “unvaxxed” shaming for months wondering when oh when will those who lean politically as I do, pick up on what has happened, the powerful suppression of both hard data and civil rights. I’m grateful RFK, Jr. (and many others) keep ringing the bell and have hopes that TRUE scientific debate can be opened as more people become aware that Big Pharma has picked America’s pockets. As one who lives with psych drug injuries, I didn’t take the bait, and am hopeful more US citizens will at least look at the information, the data, the patents, forensics really, that prove RFK, Jr’s points in the book. Again, thank you for putting this out to your mailing list.
I am disappointed that this film was offered by IMHU with minimal comment. Especially during these times, when our country is so polarized and affected by violent conspiracy ideas, and as we head into highly contentious elections, this was a surprising and disturbing contribution from IMHU to our national conversation. Obviously, at the heart of our health crisis is the for-profit health industry. However, the last thing we need right now is the amplification of sloppy scholarship, inflammatory rhetoric, and anti-vaccine hysteria, all dressed up with dramatic conspiratorial sound effects. I expected a much more measured and thoughtful contribution from IMHU. I value much of the offerings IMHU gives us, but on this one, count me out. Disappointing is putting it mildly.
Thank you, Joanne. I agree with everything you said. I was about to write something but your comment says exactly what my take on this is. I, too, was extremely disappointed and upset by this offering by IMHU. It only amplifies the conspiracy theories and creates more separation–not dialogue–between us all. I am shocked that IMHU offered this movie. Thanks for your comment.
Dear Joanne, (This will be a copy of the response I sent to Barbara Erb.) I know you had a strong reaction against the IMHU newsletter in which I posted a trailer to a film discussing views on the major media’s response to the pandemic. As you know, I am a firm believer in discussion and looking at many perspectives in order to make an informed choice. And, I am an advocate of following the science. The Atlantic recently published an article pointing out some of the inconsistencies in major media’s response to the pandemic. An MD writing for Children’s Health Defense wrote about that Atlantic article hilighting various ways major media has failed to allow us the critical thinking that journalism is supposed to be about. Here’s the link: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-pandemic-amnesty-accountability/. I understand there has been an exhausting amount of hyperbole and many of us are exhausted reading/viewing more. I found the article to be even-minded. On another note, again from my heart, I am sorry the past 2+ years have been hard on you, Emma
I posted a comment today but don’t see it now. Where can we see the comments people post?
For those interested in the science of Intermectin, here is a new study done at Duke University, published in the JAMA on Friday. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/24/ivermectin-once-touted-as-a-covid-treatment-by-conservatives-doesnt-improve-recovery-much-clinical-trial-finds.html
Dear Barbara, I know you had a strong reaction against the IMHU newsletter in which I posted a trailer to a film discussing views on the major media’s response to the pandemic. As you know, I am a firm believer in discussion and looking at many perspectives in order to make an informed choice. And, I am an advocate of following the science. The Atlantic recently published an article pointing out some of the inconsistencies in major media’s response to the pandemic. An MD writing for Children’s Health Defense wrote about that Atlantic article hilighting various ways major media has failed to allow us the critical thinking that journalism is supposed to be about. Here’s the link: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-pandemic-amnesty-accountability/. I understand there has been an exhausting amount of hyperbole and many of us are exhausted reading/viewing more. I found the article to be even-minded. On another note, again from my heart, I am sorry the past 2+ years have been hard on you, Emma